Opinion 98 - 7
|
This
opinion represents the views of the Office of the State
Comptroller at the time it was rendered. The opinion may no
longer represent those views if, among other things, there have
been subsequent court cases or statutory amendments that bear on
the issues discussed in the opinion. |
BOND AND NOTES -- Periods of Probable Usefulness (replacement of fire chiefs' cars);
(acquisition of traffic signal control system)
FIRE DISTRICTS -- Apparatus and Equipment (capital reserve fund to replace chiefs' cars) --
Appropriations and Expenditures (replacement of chiefs' cars and acquisition of traffic signal
control system) -- Powers and Duties (acquisition of chiefs' cars and traffic signal control
system)
MUNICIPAL FUNDS -- Capital Reserve Fund (creation of by fire district to replace chiefs'
cars); (creation of by fire district to acquire traffic signal control system); (acquisition of
indefinite number of items of equipment)
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS -- Traffic Signals (acquisition of traffic signal control system by a
fire district)
GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW, §6-g: A fire district may establish a capital reserve fund for the
purpose of replacing chiefs' cars. It may also establish a capital reserve fund for the purpose of
acquiring a traffic signal control system.
You ask whether a fire district may establish a capital reserve fund for the purpose of
replacing three chiefs' cars. The fund would be used to replace one car every two years for an
indefinite period of time. At the time of replacement, each car would have been in service for
about six years. You also ask whether a fire district may establish a capital reserve fund to
finance the purchase of a "traffic signal control system" to be installed at an intersection of a
local road and a State highway located near the firehouse. The system would permit fire district
personnel to control the traffic signal at the intersection in order to reduce the possibility of
accidents involving district vehicles when responding to alarms.
Initially, we note that a reserve fund is a device which permits a local government to
finance certain local government expenditures by accumulating moneys over a period of more
than one fiscal year (see Opns St Comp No. 96-24, p 52; Opns St Comp No. 96-4, p 7; see also
Korn v Gulotta, 72 NY2d 375, 534 NYS2d 108). Consequently, one condition precedent to the
establishment of a reserve fund by a local government is that the local government have authority
to expend money for the purpose for which the reserve fund is to be established.
Section 176(13) of the Town Law authorizes fire districts to purchase apparatus and
equipment for the extinguishment and prevention of fires, and for emergency rescue and first aid
squads and fire police squads. We have previously concluded that such apparatus and equipment includes a chief's car (see 1980 Opns St Comp No. 80-299, unreported; see also 15
Opns St Comp 1959, p 275; 3 Opns St Comp 1948, p 349).
We are not aware of any express statutory authority for a fire district to expend money on
a "traffic signal control system" such as the one at issue (compare General City Law, §20[32][d];
Town Law, §64[16]). It is apparent, however, that this type of "traffic signal control system"
may help to facilitate safe and expeditious fire district responses to fire alarms and other
emergencies. Thus, if such a system were utilized, the primary public benefit of the system
would be to enable the district to efficiently perform the functions for which it was established
(cf. Opn No. 92-41, supra). It is our view, therefore, that this type of "traffic signal control
system" is equipment incidental to the functions of the fire district and that a fire district is
authorized to expend money for the purchase of such a system(1).
As to whether a fire district may establish a capital reserve fund for these purposes,
section 6-g of the General Municipal Law authorizes the board of fire commissioners of a fire
district to establish capital reserve funds to finance, among other things, the acquisition of a
specific item or type of "equipment" (General Municipal Law, §6-g[2]). Insofar as here relevant,
section 6-g defines the term "equipment" as "any equipment, machinery or apparatus for the
acquisition of which a period of probable usefulness has been provided by law" (General
Municipal Law, §6-g[1][b]).
The phrase "equipment, machinery and apparatus" includes "firefighting equipment and
apparatus", such as a chief's car (see 1984 Opns St Comp No. 84-7, p 8; 1980 Opns St Comp No.
80-299, supra), and, in our view, is also broad enough to include the traffic signal control system
in question. Further, section 11.00(a)(77) of the Local Finance Law establishes a period of
probable usefulness for:
the purchase of a passenger vehicle, other than a school bus,
having a seating capacity of less than ten persons, when purchased
to replace a similar vehicle previously in service for three years or
more, or in the case of a police or fire vehicle, in service for one
year or more...
Section 11.00(a)(72) of the Local Finance Law establishes a period of probable usefulness for
"traffic signal systems". Thus, it is our opinion that the term "equipment" as used in section 6-g
includes both a replacement for a chief's car which has been in service for at least one year and
the proposed traffic signal control system.
We note that a resolution for the establishment of a capital reserve fund to finance the
acquisition of a specific item of equipment must set forth the estimated cost thereof and is
subject to permissive referendum requirements (General Municipal Law, §6-g[3]; see also Local
Finance Law, §38.00[a]). Expenditures from such a fund would not be subject to referendum
requirements (General Municipal Law, §6-g[7]). On the other hand, there are no referendum
requirements for the establishment of a capital reserve fund for a "type" of equipment.
Expenditures from such a fund, however, would be subject to permissive referendum
requirements (id.; see also Opn No. 96-24, supra).
Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion that a fire district may establish a capital reserve
fund to finance the replacement of chiefs' cars which have been in service for at least one year.
Since the fund would be established to finance the acquisition of an indefinite number of chiefs'
cars, the fund would be established to finance the acquisition of a "type" of equipment (General
Municipal Law, §6-g[2][b]; see also 1987 Opns St Comp No. 87-16, p 31). A resolution
authorizing the establishment of the fund would not be subject to permissive referendum
requirements. A resolution authorizing an expenditure from such a fund, however, would be
subject to permissive referendum requirements (General Municipal Law, §6-g[7]; see also Local
Finance Law, §38.00[a]).
It is also our opinion that a fire district may establish a capital reserve fund to finance the
acquisition of a system which would permit fire district personnel to control a traffic signal at an
intersection of a local road and State road located near the firehouse. Since the fund would be
intended to finance the acquisition of a specific system for a particular intersection, the fund
would be established to finance a "specific" item of equipment (General Municipal Law,
§6-g[2][a]). A resolution authorizing the establishment of the fund must set forth the estimated
cost of the system and would be subject to permissive referendum requirements (General
Municipal Law, §6-g[3]; see also Local Finance Law, §38.00[a]). A resolution authorizing an
expenditure from such a fund, however, would not be subject to permissive referendum
requirements (General Municipal Law, §6-g[7]).
April 29, 1998
Loring K. Manley, Chairman
Valley Cottage Fire District
1. We are informed that, consistent with this conclusion, the State Department of
Transportation ("DOT") has a longstanding policy of issuing permits for the addition of
emergency preemption features to State traffic control signals and requiring permittees, including
fire districts, to provide the requisite equipment at their own expense (see New York State
Department of Transportation, Directive on Traffic Control Program: Intersection Control --Signals [Code A09-255-3], August 14, 1981, p 3) . In addition, although not at issue here, we
note that section 1681(c) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, as amended by chapter 689 of the Laws
of 1985, generally requires DOT to install traffic control signals on State highways outside
of firehouses (see Governor's Bill Jacket for L 1985, ch 689, letter from Senator Levy to
Gerald Crotty dated July 17, 1985; Budget Report on Bills dated July 8, 1985).
|